Hang on, didn't the court find in favor of the defendent last month? That's what the Washington Post (WaPo?) reported last month: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/25/AR2007062500443.html
Yeah, they found in favor of the defendants, but the case has drained more than $100K from the defendants. And this scumbucket plaintiff is still considering another appeal in federal court. Grrrr!
Yup, this guys a serious with-all-caps LOSER. It's kind of a shame the legal system has evolved this way in America. I hope the fundraiser helps the defendants recover some of their legal fees.
4 comments:
Hang on, didn't the court find in favor of the defendent last month? That's what the Washington Post (WaPo?) reported last month:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/25/AR2007062500443.html
Yeah, they found in favor of the defendants, but the case has drained more than $100K from the defendants. And this scumbucket plaintiff is still considering another appeal in federal court. Grrrr!
Ah, so! In that case, I think the captions to figures 1 & 2 should be suffixed by "fatherless child" or some such term...
Yup, this guys a serious with-all-caps LOSER. It's kind of a shame the legal system has evolved this way in America. I hope the fundraiser helps the defendants recover some of their legal fees.
Post a Comment